This is Gua 61 ䷼ in the Yi Jing, titled “Genuine Integrity.” It is composed of ☴ Xùn Wind above ☱ Duì Lake.

中孚

zhōng fú

Inner sincerity; trustworthiness; reliable correspondence.

Meaning

  • Inner Sincerity / Integrity: A fundamental alignment between a person's internal essence and their outward intent.
  • Credibility / Trustworthiness: The quality of being reliable; a stability of character that allows others to depend upon the subject.
  • Reliable Correspondence (Resonance): A state of transparent communication or "tuning" between two parties, where alignment at the center allows for an effective connection.
  • Incubation / Latent Confidence: A trust that is patient and nurturing, allowing a potentiality to manifest over time.

Grammar and usage

  • Noun/Quality: "Inner sincerity," "centered trust."
  • Attribute/Adjective: "Trustworthy," "sincere," "credible."
  • State of Being/Verb Phrase: To achieve or maintain a state of reliable correspondence with another.

Distinctions

  • vs. 信 (xìn): While xìn often emphasizes the reliability of a specific word, promise, or factual truth, zhōng fú refers to the internal disposition and affective quality of the trust.
  • vs. 誠 (chéng): Both denote sincerity, but zhōng fú carries a specific nuance of "brooding"—a warmth or patience that fosters growth in a relationship.

History and forms

The term combines 中 (center, alignment) with 孚 (the act of brooding over eggs; incubation). The resulting concept suggests a sincerity rooted in the center that possesses a nurturing, generative quality.

Translator notes

  • Avoid reducing the term to modern equivalents like "faith" or "trust," which may lack the spatial (alignment) and biological (incubation) dimensions of the original.
  • In texts influenced by the Yi Jing, zhōng fú is often a dynamic force rather than a static virtue; it implies a capacity to penetrate barriers, bridge gaps between disparate parties, or establish credibility in high-risk situations.

Decontextualized translator aid. This page describes plausible lexical range; it does not choose what the term means in a particular passage.